Trusting and Obeying
There it was in my Facebook feed. One of those ubiquitous memes from well-meaning fellow believers:
God does not want you to try harder, he wants you to trust him deeper. Stop trying. Start trusting.
But is it true? Does God really not want us to “try hard” to become like Christ? Should we ever get to the point in our Christian sanctification where “strivings cease”? This has long been a talking point for Wesleyan and Keswick theology, in which a sort of Christian perfection may ostensibly be realized (whether temporarily or permanently) through passivity—by “letting go and letting God.” What is surprising is the surge of this kind of language in Reformed thought.
It seems that the grand hallmark of the Reformed resurgence, justification through Christ alone and apart from works, has spilled carelessly into discussions of sanctification, where such an emphasis is frankly incorrect. We are sanctified, yes, by means of union with Christ and by the ordinary means of grace, but never apart from works: works are an integral and necessary part of sanctification. Note the following:
- Ephesians 2:8–10— Paul assures his readers that “it is by grace you have been [justified], through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast.” Nonetheless, he adds, you are “created in Christ Jesus to do good works,” by which we express our sanctification.
- Philippians 3:4–14—While Paul discounts his “legalistic faultlessness” and the “righteousness of my own that comes from the law” as “rubbish” so far as justification was concerned, he nonetheless determined that until he was “made perfect,” he would, as his procedure for sanctification, “press on to take hold of that for which Christ Jesus took hold of me,…straining toward and pressing after” his goal of Christlikeness.
- Hebrews 12:1–14—The author enjoins us to “throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles, and run with perseverance the race marked out for us,” suggesting that the standard for sanctification is to “strive against sin, resisting to the point of shedding blood.” He adds further that we are to “endure hardship as discipline” and to “make every effort to be holy; for without holiness no one will see the Lord.”
- 2 Peter 1:5–11—Peter urges his readers to “make every effort to add” virtues of both character and behavior to their faith, noting that their eagerness to do these things will make their calling and election sure.
- Romans 8:13—Paul tells his readers to “put to death the deeds of the body” as part of the necessary progress of the justified believer that culminates in the experience of eternal life (so also Col 3:5; Gal 5:24).
- Philippians 2:12—Paul encourages his readers to “work out their salvation with fear and trembling,” noting that sanctification is a synergistic activity: “God works in you…to work.”
- 1 Corinthians 9:27—Paul applies this standard to himself: “I discipline my body and make it my slave, so that, after I have preached to others, I myself will not be disqualified.”
There can be no doubt, surely, that moral resolve, determination, discipline, effort, struggle, straining, and striving are the verbs of sanctification. Now, to be sure, these verbs do not represent the totality of our sanctification, but they surely cannot be denied a place without doing great despite to the Christian Scriptures.
But Mark, you say, what about Psalm 46:10: “Be still [NASB—cease striving] and know that I am God”? There is it in black and white! Christians need to cease striving! OK, but let’s not neglect the context. What we have here is at best a command for believers to stop worrying and to trust in God (i.e., the context could possibly suggest this [so Craigie], and the idea itself is unobjectionable [cf. Ps 37:7]). But it is more likely that Psalm 46:10 represents a command for violent and savage people who hate God to stop warring against him and to acknowledge his sovereignty [so Goldingay; Ross; Kidner]. But in no hermeneutical universe can this verse be taken as a command for believers to stop trying to be holy and instead to become holy by mere reflection on God.
The testimony of Scripture is clear. God wants us to try harder (after all, the standard is for us to strive against sin to the point of bloodshed—Heb 12:3–4). But he also wants to trust him. It’s not an either/or; it’s a both/and: Trust and obey.
Dr. Snoeberger,
Thanks for this great reminder. I am quite shocked at how pervasive the “let go, and let God” philosophy has permeated Christianity. Many of my ministry battles have come from advocating the view you have explained above.
On a side note (because the comments are disabled on your previous post regarding dispensationalism) can you suggest some good resources apart from McClain (and the books on DBTS library list) which argue for the traditional dispensational understanding of the Gospel of the Kingdom?
A couple of recent works that take a view of the Kingdom similar to McClain’s are Mike Vlach’s He Will Reign Forever and Andrews Woods’s The Coming Kingdom. They are not identically situated in the discussion, but both make good contributions.