Worldview Flowchart

by | Nov 30, 2017 | Articles

A number of years ago I stumbled on the following chart in Boa and Bowman’s book, Faith Has its Reasons.[1] The representation below has been modified in a few minor ways from its original depiction. And while the chart is not perfect (some belief systems hold to more than one of these, though doing so is irrational), I think it is helpful.

The first question concerns whether there is a God, and this is clearly a most significant question. Nevertheless, the chart accurately indicates that some want to not make a decision (agnosticism), while others will elect to say they do not believe in God (atheism). The second question concerns whether there is one God or many gods. Those who take the latter are polytheists, while those who take the former have another question to answer; Is this one God infinite or finite? At this point, the chart splits in two. Consequently, the next question has four possibilities based on the question of whether God is personal or impersonal. If the person’s conception of God is that he is finite and impersonal, then the person holds to panentheism. Alternatively, one who holds to a finite but personal god holds to process theology or, more popularly, open theism. If on the other hand, one argues for an infinite, impersonal god, the person is a pantheist. One final question pertains to those who hold to an infinite, personal God: Does God interact with the world? If not, the person holds to deism. If so, the person holds to theism.

I should say that the original chart goes one step beyond what I have presented here by asking whether one believes in the Trinity, making a distinction between Christian Theism and unitarian conceptions, of which there are many (JW, Mormonism, Islam). And while this chart may not prove as useful as James Anderson’s book What is your Worldview?, it helps us think through the various worldviews at a quick glance.

[1] The book can be accessed for free through Bible.org, and the page where the chart is found is linked here. They give credit to Kreeft, Geisler, and Watkins for the ideas that produced the chart.

Latest Posts
The Church and Missions

The Church and Missions

What is a missionary, biblically speaking—and why should the local church, not the individual, be at the center of missions? In this episode of Theologically Driven, Phil Cecil is joined by Jeremy Pittsley, a Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary professor and former...

The Church and Missions

Answering Objections to Animal Sacrifices in the Millennial Kingdom

Does a literal sacrificial system in Ezekiel 40–48 contradict the finality of Christ's sacrifice in Hebrews? Jeremy Pittsley walks through the main interpretations of the millennial temple and answers the three most common objections to taking Ezekiel literally: that...

The Church and Missions

On Writing

Does writing still matter once you're out of seminary? Dr. Mark Snoeberger joins Theologically Driven to make the case that good thinking and good writing go hand in hand — and that a well-researched paper is closer to a sermon than most pastors realize. He covers why...